Talk:Tom Paris
From FEInfobase
(→Ownership) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ==Paris is dead== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Well this one kinda got away from us. Paris has been "dead" since 2405. Admiral Chadwick is doing his job | ||
| + | currently. Sorry about that folks. | ||
| + | :[[User:Captain Davies|Captain Davies]] 16:25, 11 February 2013 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
== The kitchen sink == | == The kitchen sink == | ||
| Line 8: | Line 18: | ||
I'm not saying make him a PC, but someone Chris has the rights to play if the opportunity/necessity arises.. - [[User:Ingram|Ingram]] | I'm not saying make him a PC, but someone Chris has the rights to play if the opportunity/necessity arises.. - [[User:Ingram|Ingram]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | (*kills Ingram*) There's nothing stopping Chris or anyone else in FE using the character, it's the same with any canon trek character in FE (to a certain degree). Ownership is more about how a character is developed by a particular FE player. I was the first one to use Paris in FE - he was simple going to be an admiral who gave out orders to us on DS1 and Enterprise-F. I didn't want to use (at the time) Picard because both Alex and Dan were using him in their sims. But then when others saw me using Paris they placed him in to a more "crucial" context at Starfleet Headquarters. Paris is heavily used on (if not all) the SRI sims. He's kinda like Admiral Forrest was to Captain Archer in Enterprise. [[User:MJ|MJ]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | :And Forrest was murdered... ^_^ - [[User:Chris|''the'''''Chris''']] 07:04, 10 April 2006 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 22:25, 11 February 2013
Paris is dead
Well this one kinda got away from us. Paris has been "dead" since 2405. Admiral Chadwick is doing his job currently. Sorry about that folks.
- Captain Davies 16:25, 11 February 2013 (CST)
The kitchen sink
To my knowledge (and I might be wrong on this), there's no such term as "second commander-in-chief," even in a theoretical sense. Lesser commanders are often referred to as the CINC of a particular area or department, for example CINCPAC (Pacific) or CINC CENTCOM (Central Command). So Paris might be CINCOPS or something, but I don't think second CINC is the best title for him. - Chris 12:16, 6 April 2006 (EDT)
Ownership
I know MJ may kill me for suggesting his beloved Tom be taken away from him, but was it ever considered that theChris should take (even partial maybe) ownership of the NPC considering that, y'know, Starfleet Command kind of revovles around him.
I'm not saying make him a PC, but someone Chris has the rights to play if the opportunity/necessity arises.. - Ingram
(*kills Ingram*) There's nothing stopping Chris or anyone else in FE using the character, it's the same with any canon trek character in FE (to a certain degree). Ownership is more about how a character is developed by a particular FE player. I was the first one to use Paris in FE - he was simple going to be an admiral who gave out orders to us on DS1 and Enterprise-F. I didn't want to use (at the time) Picard because both Alex and Dan were using him in their sims. But then when others saw me using Paris they placed him in to a more "crucial" context at Starfleet Headquarters. Paris is heavily used on (if not all) the SRI sims. He's kinda like Admiral Forrest was to Captain Archer in Enterprise. MJ
- And Forrest was murdered... ^_^ - theChris 07:04, 10 April 2006 (EDT)