Talk:General Orders
From FEInfobase
(Difference between revisions)
| (2 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I added it from the BF site. [[General order 23]] - [[User:Chris|Chris]] 09:53, 20 January 2006 (EST) | I added it from the BF site. [[General order 23]] - [[User:Chris|Chris]] 09:53, 20 January 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I don't think we have the prime directive anymore in FE, if we do - it's being broken all the time ;) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :[[User:Taylor|~Dan]] 11:35, 23 January 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: I've removed General Order 23 again after talking to Mr Alex, I'd explain why he wants it gone. But I think your all big enough to eventually stumble upon the answer - get your thinking caps on folks ;) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::: [[User:Taylor|~Dan]] 05:52, 30 January 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::Just 'cus I couldn't remember what it was, | ||
| + | :::::''When verifiable proof is presented to the senior commanding officer of a Starfleet vessel or post that a Federation representative may currently be acting or have acted in the past to violate the Prime Directive, the officer may relieve said representative of office, then assume the full powers of that office pending a full investigation by governmental officials.'' | ||
| + | ::::Makes sense someone removing it in FE - is there a specific reason it's happened though or is it for future plot? - [[User:Chris|Chris]] 09:36, 2 February 2006 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:36, 2 February 2006
Where is General Order 23? - Ross Taben
I added it from the BF site. General order 23 - Chris 09:53, 20 January 2006 (EST)
I don't think we have the prime directive anymore in FE, if we do - it's being broken all the time ;)
- ~Dan 11:35, 23 January 2006 (EST)
- I've removed General Order 23 again after talking to Mr Alex, I'd explain why he wants it gone. But I think your all big enough to eventually stumble upon the answer - get your thinking caps on folks ;)
- ~Dan 05:52, 30 January 2006 (EST)
- Just 'cus I couldn't remember what it was,
- When verifiable proof is presented to the senior commanding officer of a Starfleet vessel or post that a Federation representative may currently be acting or have acted in the past to violate the Prime Directive, the officer may relieve said representative of office, then assume the full powers of that office pending a full investigation by governmental officials.
- Makes sense someone removing it in FE - is there a specific reason it's happened though or is it for future plot? - Chris 09:36, 2 February 2006 (EST)
- Just 'cus I couldn't remember what it was,