Template talk:User-Threshold
From FEInfobase
(Difference between revisions)
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Redundant page.... We have a userbox template for every simm, Slagar, do not create extras. | Redundant page.... We have a userbox template for every simm, Slagar, do not create extras. | ||
:[[User:Kayvin Jal|Kayvin Jal]] 06:07, 7 August 2008 (UTC) | :[[User:Kayvin Jal|Kayvin Jal]] 06:07, 7 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
| − | ::First, the "user has a character on" user tempates predate the newer "contributes too" template by about three years, so if anything the others are "extra". Secondly, as we discussed in EF, "contributes to" and "has a character on" are not the same thing, so not redundant. - [[User:Slagar|Slagar]] 06:48, 7 August 2008 (UTC) | + | ::First, the "user has a character on" user tempates predate the newer "contributes too" template by about three years, so if anything the others are "extra". Secondly, as we discussed in EF, "contributes to" and "has a character on" are not the same thing, so not redundant. Oh, and finally the character on templates link to both the character in question ''and'' the simm as opposed to simm only, so they're more functional, and on that basis alone I'm keeping it. - [[User:Slagar|Slagar]] 06:48, 7 August 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:50, 7 August 2008
Redundant page.... We have a userbox template for every simm, Slagar, do not create extras.
- Kayvin Jal 06:07, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
- First, the "user has a character on" user tempates predate the newer "contributes too" template by about three years, so if anything the others are "extra". Secondly, as we discussed in EF, "contributes to" and "has a character on" are not the same thing, so not redundant. Oh, and finally the character on templates link to both the character in question and the simm as opposed to simm only, so they're more functional, and on that basis alone I'm keeping it. - Slagar 06:48, 7 August 2008 (UTC)